Reach Us +44 1477412632

Association of Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Type 2 Diabetes in Egypt: A Hospital-Based Study

Shaimaa Baher Abdel-aziz1*, Yasmine Samir Galal1, Amal Samir Sedrak1, Dina Samy Shaheen2

1Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

2Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

Corresponding Author:
Shaimaa Baher Abdel-aziz
Assistant professor of Public health
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine
Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Tel: 01226742424
Fax: +20 2 23644383
E-mail: [email protected]

Received January 7, 2016; Accepted April 29, 2016; Published May 9, 2016

Visit for more related articles at Health Science Journal


Background: The relation between hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of an association between T2DM and HCV.

Methods: A case control study was conducted at the outpatients' clinics of Kasr El-Aini Hospital (KAH), from October 2013 till March 2014. In this study, 389 HCV patients were selected as cases and 389 healthy controls were also included. Demographic and clinical data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Laboratory investigations including liver function tests (LFT), blood glucose level and radioimmunoblot assay (ELISA) were performed.

Results: Out of 389 HCV cases, 219 (56.3%) were diabetic, whereas 145 (37.3%) were diabetic among the healthy controls. Occurrence of diabetes among cirrhotic patients was 1.7 times higher than non-cirrhotic. Logistic regression showed that residence (P<0.001, OR=2.7), occupation (P=0.03, OR=1.8), smoking (P=0.04, OR=2) were the predictive factors for occurrence of T2DM in HCV patients.

Conclusions: In this study, we found a positive association between HCV infection and T2DM. Residence, occupation and smoking were the predictive factors for the association of T2DM in HCV patients, whereas hypertension and BMI were only adjunctive factors.


HCV; Predictive factors; T2DM; Cirrhosis


Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection is a major public health problem, which currently affects over 200 million people, with an estimated prevalence of 2.2% globally [1]. Egypt has the highest prevalence rate of HCV in the world, making it the most challenging health problem facing the country. Studies show that 14.7% of the Egyptian population carry HCV antibodies [2] and 9.8% have an active infection [3].

The wave of increased HCV-related morbidity and mortality is likely due to the widespread availability of injectable therapies and the illicit use of injectable drugs [4]. Currently the association between HCV infection and T2DM had been reported in a number of clinical studies though conflicting results were reported [5,6].

Both diabetes and HCV infection are severe health problems worldwide, especially in the developing countries [7,8]. A range of extra-hepatic manifestations such as arthralgia, thyroiditis and diabetes are linked with HCV infections [9]. Studies have shown that patients infected with HCV have more glucose intolerance than the general population [10,11].

The mechanism of pathogenesis of diabetes in patients with HCV infection remains unclear though it has been implicated that insulin resistance plays an important role and is related to fibrosis score [12].

T2DM is a major public health problem worldwide that is rapidly emerging due to increasing prevalence of obesity and sedentary lifestyle [8]. Aging, obesity, family history of diabetes, and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) co infection are recognized influencing factors associated with diabetes development among HCV-infected patients [13]. So early screening of these patients for detection of DM is recommended to improve patients’ outcome and quality of services.

Several studies from different parts of the world have found that 13% to 33% of patients with chronic HCV have associated diabetes, mostly T2DM [14,15]. In Egypt, some studies have reported that the prevalence of T2DM among HCV patients is 25.4% [16] and that chronic HCV patients are three times more likely to develop T2DM than HCV seronegative patients [17]. Therefore, it is important to identify changing in magnitude of the problem of DM in order to optimize the cost and reduce failure of treatment in HCV patients who are at risk to develop T2DM.

The aim of this study was to elucidate the presence of association between HCV and T2DM and explore the factors that might be predicting the occurrence of DM in patients with HCV considering other known possible DM risk factors.

Patients and Methods

Study design, period and setting

A nested case-control study was conducted from October 2013 till March 2014, at the Tropical Medicine and Gastroenterology outpatients' clinics of KAH, Cairo University. It is one of the largest tertiary care academic teaching hospitals in the region. At the present time, it has 36 departments, 42 specialized units, 5200 beds over 9 hospitals which serve approximately 2 million patients a year.

Study participants

Only HCV patients who were older than 18 years and had their antibody profile positive for HCV, were included as cases. Patients with decompensated liver disease, cancer, on interferon therapy, autoimmune disease, having end stage renal disease or coexisting viral infection like hepatitis B surface antigen positive patients, pregnant females were excluded from the research. Controls were recruited from the cardiology and chest outpatient clinics of KAH with normal liver function tests, no serological evidence of HCV and no recent illness.

The sample size was estimated by using the statistical software program Epicalc [18]. The minimum required sample size was 778 subjects (389 HCV-positive cases and 389 HCVnegative controls) based on an alpha error (type I error) of 5%, 80% statistical power and an accepted error of 2%. All the participants were recruited from the selected clinics by using a systematic random sampling technique whereas every 3rd patient was interviewed.

Data collection and laboratory methods

Data was collected using a structured questionnaire containing questions related to demographic, clinical characteristics and nutritional status of patients.

HCV infection was diagnosed if patients were seropositive for anti-HCV, and conformational testing was performed by ELISA if the diagnosis was in doubt. A laboratory technician aseptically collected 3-5 mL of venous blood by using plain vacutainer tube for the detection of the anti-HCV antibodies and level of liver enzymes, 3ml blood sample in the plain tube were centrifuged at 3000 RPM for 5 minutes to separate the serum and some of it were used for determination of level liver enzymes: Aspartate transaminase (AST), Alanine transaminase (ALT) within one hour of separation. The remaining serum was kept in deep freezer at (-20°C) until detection of anti-HCV antibodies. All samples were sent to the lab at the clinical pathology department, Cairo University Hospitals for diagnosis. Abdominal ultrasonography was done for serological HCV-positive patients to diagnose liver cirrhosis.

To investigate diabetes the remaining 2 ml of venous blood was drawn in EDTA-supplied test tubes and samples were sent to the lab for investigation. Defining T2DM was done according to the American Diabetes Association guidelines [19]. Patients were assigned a diagnosis of DM if there was a documented use of oral hypoglycemic medication or insulin; poor glycemic control (random blood sugar >200 mg/dL).

Patients who had corticosteroid- induced diabetes were excluded. From each HCV antibody-positive diabetic patient, the researchers reviewed the date of diagnosis of DM, type of DM and dates of possible exposure to HCV infection or onset of hepatitis when known. Uncontrolled or newly diagnosed diabetic patients were sent to the specialist clinic for further medical care and follow up.

Assessment of the nutritional status was done for the study participants by measuring body weight and height. After recording the measurements, patients were classified according to their body mass index (BMI) into: underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal (18.5-24.99 kg/m2), overweight (25-29.99 Kg/m2) and obese (≥ 30 Kg/m2) [20].

Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was carried out using SPSS software for Windows, version 21 Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) [21]. Descriptive analysis was performed and the results were expressed as mean ± SD and percentages. Comparison between groups (cases and controls) was done using the Student’s t test for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square test for nominal categorical variables. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the predictive variables that could be associated with the presence of diabetes. Odds ratio (OR) and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. P value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical Considerations

After explaining the purpose of the study, a written informed consent was taken from the participants before collecting data and taking samples. The current research was approved by the ethics committee of the KAH and was conducted in accordance with Helsinki declaration [22].


In this study, a total of 778 participants (389HCV cases and 389 non HCV controls) were included. Out of this total, DM was found in 364 patients; 219 (56.3%) HCV cases and 145 (37.3%) non HCV controls, 342 patients were aware of their problem, whereas 22 cases were newly diagnosed. There was a two fold increase in the percentage of diabetes among HCV cases as compared to non HCV controls (Figure 1), and the mean duration of diabetes among known diabetic patients was (7.41 ± 3.82) years.


Figure 1: Diabetes among HCV cases in comparison to non HCV controls.

HCV cases diabetics and non-diabetics

Out of 389 HCV cases, DM was found in 219 (56.3%), among which only 63 (28.8%) were controlled diabetic cases (good glycemic control), 139 (63.4%) were uncontrolled (poor glycemic control), and 17 (7.8 %) were newly diagnosed (random blood sugar >200 mg/dl). Table 1 shows that the majority cases were older than forty years and were females. The mean duration of hepatic illness among HCV diabetic cases (15.55 ± 8.81 years) was significantly higher (P=0.01) than that of HCV non diabetics (12.76 ± 6.34 years). There was a significant association between cirrhosis and diabetes in HCV patients (P=0.001).

Variables HCV Diabetic (N=219) N (%) HCV Non-Diabetic (N=170) (N (%) P value
Age (years)      
<40 12 (5.5) 9 (5.3) 0.936
>40 207 (94.5) 161 (94.7)
Male 64(29.2) 40(23.5) 0.208
Female 155(70.8) 130(76.5)
Mean duration of hepatic disease      
Mean+SD (years) 15.55+8.81 12.76+6.34 0.01*
CLD status      
HCV 72(32.9) 84(49.4) 0.001*
HCV+cirrhosis 147(67.1) 86(50.6)
Marital status      
Married 158 (72.1) 121 (71.2) 0.833
Not married 61 (27.9) 49 (28.8)
Less than secondary 204 (93.2) 141 (82.9) <0.001*
Secondary & more 15 (6.8) 29 (17.1)
Working‡ 112(51.1) 79 (46.5) 0.634
Not working 107(48.9) 91 (53.5)
Urban 136 (62.1) 76 (44.7) 0.001*
Rural 83(37.9) 94 (55.3)
History of smoking      
Yes 190 (86.8) 139 (81.8) 0.176
No 29 (13.2) 31 (18.2)
History of hypertension§      
Yes 134 (61.2) 76 (44.7) 0.001*
No 85 (38.8) 94 (55.3)
Family History of Diabetes||      
Yes 122 (55.7) 69 (40.6) 0.03*
No 97 (44.3) 101 (59.4)
History of bilharzias infection      
Yes 103 (47.0) 80 (47.1) 0.996
No 116(53.0) 90 (52.9)
History of Tooth extraction      
Yes 207 (94.5) 160 (94.1) 0.865
No 12 (5.5) 10 (5.9)
History of blood transfusion      
Yes 69 (31.5) 52 (30.6) 0.846
No 150 (68.5) 118 (69.4)
History of hospital admission      
Yes 58 (26.5) 52(30.6) 0.373
No 161 (73.5) 118 (69.4)
History ofinjection (IV/IM)      
Yes 36 (16.4) 31 (18.2) 0.09
No 183 (83.6) 139 (81.8)
BMI (kg/m2)      
Normal(<25 ) 87 (39.7) 51 (30.0) 0.04*
Overweight/ obese(>25 ) 132 (60.3) 119 (70.0)
AST (U/L)      
Normal (<40) 68 (31.1) 69 (40.6) 0.05*
Elevated(>40) 151(68.9) 101 (59.4)
ALT (U/L)      
Normal(<40) 79 (36.1) 76 (44.7) 0.08
Elevated(>40) 140 (63.9) 94 (55.3)
Cholesterol level † (mg/dl)      
Normal (<200) 23 (71.9) 19 (100.0) 0.01*
Elevated(>200) 9 (28.1) 0 (0.0)

Table 1: Sociodemograhic and clinical characteristics of diabetic and non-diabetic HCV cases.

CLD: Chronic Liver Disease Status; BMI: Body Mass Index; IV: Intra-Venous; IM: Intra-Muscular; AST: Aspartate Transaminase; ALT: Alanine Transaminase

* Statistically significant value <0.05 †Total cases=32, controls=19

‡workers include: farmer, builder, industrial, trade workers.

§Includes patients who require special diet or antihypertensive agents.

||Indicates presence of at least one first-degree relative affected by DM.

Bivariate analysis was used to compare some risk factors between diabetic and non-diabetic HCV patients (Table 1). The occurrence of DM was significantly associated with level of education (P<0.001), residence (P=0.001), history of hypertension (P=0.001), family history of DM (P=0.03), and higher BMI (P=0.04). Significantly higher AST and cholesterol levels were detected among HCV diabetic cases compared with non-diabetics. As regards HCV risk factors which include: history of bilharzia infection, tooth extraction, blood transfusion, hospital admission, history of injection; none of these risk factors were significantly associated with HCV in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients (P>0.05) (Table 1).

The binary logistic regression model was used to detect the predictive variables for occurrence of DM among HCV patients. Residence (P=0.005, OR=1.8, 95%CI: 1.20-2.95), history of hypertension (P=0.01, OR=1.6, 95%CI: 1.09-2.62) and family history of diabetes (P=0.01, OR=1.7, 95% CI: 1.14-2.74) were found to be independently associated with DM (OR>1) (Table 2). The occurrence ofT2DM in HCV cirrhotic patients was 1.7 times higher as compared with non-cirrhotic patients (P=0.02, OR=1.7, 95% CI: 1.08-2.69).

Risk factors OR Lower Upper P value
Secondary & more 1 0.17 0.7 0.003*
Less than secondary 0.3
Rural 1 1.2 2.95 0.005*
Urban 1.8
History of hypertension        
No 1 1.09 2.62 0.01*
Yes 1.6
Family history of diabetes        
No 1 1.14 2.74 0.01*
Yes 1.7
Chronic hepatitis 1 1.08 2.69 0.02*
Cirrhosis 1.7
BMI (kg/m2)        
Normal(<25 ) 1 0.35 0.895 0.01*
Overweight/ obese(>25 ) 0.5

Table 2: Logistic regression for significant variables predicting the occurrence of diabetes among HCV cases.

HCV controls diabetics and non-diabetics

Out of 389 HCV controls, DM was found in 145 (37.3%), among which 49 (33.8%) were controlled diabetics (good glycemic control), 91 (62.8%) were uncontrolled (poor glycemic control) and 5 (3.4%) were newly diagnosed patients (random blood glucose >200 mg/dl). Table 3 shows that age distribution, gender, marital status, family history of DM, and BMI differed significantly among non HCV controls regarding their diabetic state. Also in non HCV controls, diabetic subjects had significantly higher AST and ALT levels.

Variables HCV controls Diabetic (N=145) N (%) HCV controls Non-Diabetic (N=244) N (%) P value
Age ( years)    
<40 23 (15.9) 111 (45.5) <0.001
>40 122 (84.1) 133 (54.5)
Male 14(9.7) 51(20.9) 0.004*
Female 131(90.3) 193(79.1)
Marital status    
Married 101 (69.7) 201 (82.4) 0.004*
Not married 44 (30.3) 43 (17.6)
Less than secondary 139 (95.9) 227 (93.0) 0.253
Secondary & more 6 (4.1% 17 (7.0%
Working 54 (37.2) 82(33.5) 0.497
Not working 91(62.8) 162(66.5)
Urban 51 (35.2) 67 (27.5) 0.111
Rural 94 (64.8) 177 (72.5)
History of smoking    
Yes 113 (77.9) 184 (75.4) 0.572
No 32 (22.1) 60 (24.6)
History of hypertension  
Yes 106 (73.1) 161 (66.0) 0.143
No 39 (26.9) 83 (34.0)
Family History of Diabetes  
Yes 90 (62.1) 91 (37.3) <0.001*
No 55 (37.9) 153 (62.7)
BMI (kg/m2)    
Normal(<25 ) 27 (18.6) 84 (34.4) 0.001*
Overweight/ obese(>25 ) 118 (81.4) 160 (65.6)
AST (U/L)      
Normal (<40) 77 (53.1) 194 (79.5) 0.001*
Elevated(>40) 68 (46.9) 50 (20.5)
ALT (U/L)      
Normal(<40) 98 (67.6) 211 (86.5) <0.001*
Elevated(>40) 47 (32.4) 33 (13.5)
Cholesterol level † (mg/dl)  
Normal (<200) 31 (86.1) 11(68.7) 0.143
Elevated(>200) 5 (13.9) 5 (31.3)

Table 3:Sociodemograhicand clinical characteristics of diabetic and non-diabetic HCV controls.

HCV diabetics and non HCV diabetics

Out of 364 diabetic patients, 112 (30.8%) patients were controlled diabetic sand 252 (69.2%) patients had random blood sugar >200 mg/dl. In Table 4, comparison between diabetic HCV cases and non HCV controls revealed that: more cases were older than forty years (62.9% vs. 37.1%); females (54.2% vs. 45.8%); married (61% vs. 39%); had lower level of education (59.1% vs. 40.5%); working (67.5% vs. 32.5%) from urban localities (72.7% vs. 27.3%) and had family history of diabetes (57.5% vs. 42.5%). The difference between diabetic cases and controls was statistically significant regarding the former parameters except for the marital status, education and family history of diabetes.

Variables Diabetic HCV cases N (%) Diabetic Non HCV controls N (%) Total (N=364) P value
Age ( years)      
<40 12 (34.3) 23 (65.7) 35 (9.6) 0.001*
>40 207 (62.9) 122 (37.1) 329 (90.4)
Male 64 (82.1) 14(17.9) 78(21.4) < 0.001*
Female 155 (54.2) 131 (45.8) 286 (78.6)
Marital status      
Married 158 (61.0) 101 (39.0) 259 (71.2) 0.608
Not married 61 (58.1) 44 (41.9) 105 (28.8)
Less than secondary 204(59.5) 139 (40.5) 343 (94.2) 0.277
Secondary & more 15 (71.4) 6 (28.6) 21 (5.8)
Working 112(67.5) 54 (32.5) 166(45.6) <0.001*
Not working 107 (54.0) 91(46.0) 198 (54.4)
Urban 136(72.7) 51 (27.3) 187 (51.4) <0.001*
Rural 83 (46.9) 94 (53.1) 177(48.6)
History of smoking      
Yes 190(62.7) 113 (37.3) 303 (83.2) 0.02*
No 29 (47.5) 32 (52.5) 61 (16.8)
History of hypertension    
Yes 134 (55.8) 106 (44.2) 240(65.9) 0.01*
No 85 (68.5) 39(31.5) 124(34.1)
Family History of Diabetes    
Yes 122 (57.5) 90 (42.5) 212 (58.2) 0.228
No 97 (63.8) 55 (36.2) 152 (41.8)
BMI kg/m2      
Normal(<25) 87 (76.3) 27 (23.7) 114 (31.3) < 0.001*
Overweight/obese(>25) 132 (52.8) 118 (47.2) 250 (68.7)
AST (U/L)        
Normal (<40) 68 (46.9) 77 (53.1) 145(39.8) < 0.001*
Elevated(>40) 151 (68.9) 68 (31.1) 219(60.2)
ALT (U/L)        
Normal(<40) 79 (44.6) 98 (55.4) 177 (48.6) < 0.001*
Elevated(>40) 140 (74.9) 47(25.1) 187(51.4)
Cholesterol level † (mg/dl)    
Normal (<200) 23 (42.6) 31 (57.4) 54 (79.4) 0.147
Elevated(>200) 9 ( 64.3) 5 (35.7) 14 (20.6)
Glycemic control (mg/dl)    
Good( <200) 63 (56.3) 49 (43.7) 112(69.2) 0.309
Bad(>200) 156 (61.9) 96(38.1) 252(30.8)

Table 4:Sociodemograhic and clinical characteristics of diabetic HCV cases and non HCV controls.

A significantly higher proportion of diabetic HCV cases were smokers (62.7% vs. 37.3%) and hypertensive (55.8% vs. 44.2%) in comparison to diabetic non HCV controls (P<0.05). As for their nutritional status, it was indicated that subjects with BMI of >25 Kg/m2 (68.7%) had a significantly higher chance (P<0.001) to become diabetic as compared with normal BMI. Regarding abnormal lab characteristics, diabetic HCV cases had significantly higher AST (68.9% vs. 31.1%) and ALT levels (74.9% vs. 25.1%) than diabetic non HCV controls (P<0.001).

Risk factors OR Lower Upper Sig
<40 years 1 0.77 3.99 0.18
>40 years 1.7
Male 1 0.3 1.45 0.309
Female 0.6
Rural 1 1.61 4.7 <0.001*
Urban 2.7
Not working 1 1.04 3.42 0.03*
Working? 1.8
History of smoking        
No 1 1 4.26 0.04*
Yes 2
 History of hypertension        
No 1 0.28 1.15 0.118
Yes 0.5
BMI kg/m2        
Normal(< 25) 1 0.32 1.15 0.131
Overweight/obese(>25) 0.6

Table 5: Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with DM among HCV cases and controls.

After applying a logistic regression model, residence (P<0.001, OR=2.7, 95%CI: 1.61-4.70), occupation (P=0.03, OR=1.8, 95%CI: 1.04-3.42), smoking (P=0.04, OR=2.0, 95% CI: 1.00-4.26,) were the predictive factors for occurrence of DM in patients with HCV (Table 5).


There is a growing body of literature on the link between T2DM and HCV, however, studies are contradictory and the data is inconclusive [23,24]. Recent data had suggested that the prevalence of T2DM in HCV seropositive patients is three times higher compared to non HCV controls [25-27]. The present study found a strong association between HCV and T2DM, however, 22 diabetic cases were unaware of their endocrinal problem before being screened. The later findings highlight the importance of periodical screening for HCV patients especially in advanced stages. In contrast, some studies provided evidence against a potential association between these two disorders [16,28,29].

In Egypt the estimated prevalence of overt DM in adult ranges from10% to 20% [30], which is about 2 to 3 times less than what was found in this study (56.5%), indicating that patients with HCV are a high-risk population for DM. This is in agreement with a previous study done in India [31] but in contrast with others [10,32]. This contradiction may be attributed to differences in environmental factors, genetic susceptibility and diet.

Consistent with other previous studies [16,27], HCV cirrhotic patients had a significantly higher prevalence of DM than noncirrhotic patients. In contrast, Giordanino et al. [32] reported different findings. The discrepancies among studies may be explained by the degree of severity of liver disease. Expectedly, the current study revealed an independent association between cirrhosis and DM rate (OR=1.7). Similarly, studies from different areas [33-35] proves that advancing liver disease increased susceptibility of HCV seropositive patients to develop T2DM [33].

Age is another definite risk factor for T2DM in the normal population [20]. In this study HCV diabetic cases were older than non HCV diabetic subjects, which is interestingly similar to the findings of other studies [36,37] by supporting the idea that the occurrence of diabetes in HCV patients is progressive rather than abrupt [15]. Other studies suggest that HCV interferes with glucose metabolism independently of age [21,24]. Therefore, screening for and prevention of diabetes in persons with HCV infection should be started earlier than the suggested age of ≥ 45 years for the general population [28].

Diabetes as a disease affects both the male and female gender [38]. In this study, there were more female diabetic patients positive for anti-HCV antibodies than their male counter parts, which corroborate an earlier report by Huang et al. [38].

HCV patients with T2DM tended to have lower educational attainment in comparison to non-diabetics [24]. The present study showed a significant association between educational level and HCV Ab seroprevalence (P<0.001) and this agrees with the work done by Gacche et al. [39]. High prevalence of HCV in illiterate people may be attributed to many factors such as paucity of health education programs about chronic viral hepatitis in educational systems and inaccurate estimates of the burden of disease.

In the present study, both bivariate and regression analysis showed that the occurrence of diabetes among HCV cases was independently related to occupation and residence, where most of the HCV cases were skilled workers and from urban localities in comparison to non HCV diabetic controls. This agrees with the work of Elhawary et al. [16] who observed the same findings.

Habitual smoking is a well-documented risk factor for exacerbation of liver conditions [40]. There was a history of cigarette smoking among 62.7% of HCV diabetic subjects in comparison to 37.3% of non HCV diabetic subjects. This finding is similar to that reported by Eissa et al. [41], but in contradiction with Alavian et al. [42] who noted lower figures.

Although DM was associated with hypertension in bivariate analysis, it lost its significance as a predictor of DM in the logistic regression model after adjustment for other related variables. It is currently believed that the presence of cardiovascular disease is rare in cirrhosis and that cirrhotic patients have a low prevalence of vascular disease including hypertension even in the presence of overt DM [43,44]. The current study supported this hypothesis showing no difference in the rate of hypertension between diabetic HCV cases and controls.

Family history of DM is a well-known risk factor for DM. The correlation between DM and HCV in this study remained significant even when family history of DM was entered through logistic regression model. When diabetes groups were analyzed separately among studied HCV patients, it was observed that patients with a positive family history of DM did not show an increased frequency of DM. Interestingly, this coincides with the work of Nadok et al. [44] who indicated that liver injury per se was associated with DM and that a family history of DM was only an adjunctive factor.

Overweight and obesity are major causes of fatty liver disease, insulin resistance, and T2DM [45,46]. Coexistence of HCV infection and overweight increases the risk of developing diabetes. In the current study, high BMI was one of the factors associated with the occurrence of diabetes among HCV cases, but it lost its significance in the logistic regression model. This finding shows that the diabetogenic effect of HCV infection is nearly similar to the effect of overweight and obesity [47]. This finding is important for public health and clinical practice because the prevalence of HCV infections endemic in some developing countries and high-risk groups in developed countries because of unsafe injections and intravenous drug use [41]. Therefore, it is particularly important for HCVinfected persons to change their lifestyle to control their body weight to prevent the development of diabetes.

In a study conducted by Harris individuals withT2DM had a higher incidence of liver function test (LFT) abnormalities than non-diabetics [48], which is similar to the findings of this study. However, Chehadeh et al. [15] found no difference in this aspect. In present study, levels of liver enzymes and cholesterol in diabetics were higher in HCV cases compared with non-HCV controls, which may have therapeutic implications in the management of patients with HCV. It is necessary to emphasize weight control in overweight patients in order to decrease both the risk of DM and to prevent liver damage. Since the co-infection ofT2DM and HCV has been established to worsen each other, it is crucial to perform screening tests to determine the prevalence of T2DM among HCV patients.

In relation to glycemic control, it was noted that patients with bad glycemic control were at more at risk of having HCV infection as compared to those with good glycemic control, which goes in accordance with Jadoon et al. [48] who reported the same finding. This may be because of various confounding factors, which warrants further investigation. In this regard, screening for diabetes should be indicated in these patients.

Study Limitations

The most important limitations in this study were: small sample size, hospital-based study and the difficulty of testing for HCV RNA in a teaching hospital like Cairo University due to the very high cost and limited facilities.

Conclusion and Recommendation

There is a significant association between HCV infection and T2DM. However, it remains unclear whether HCV infection is a risk factor for diabetes or vice versa. Development of T2DM increases by nearly two folds if an HCV patient has cirrhosis. Residence, occupation and smoking were the predictive factors for the association of T2DM in HCV patients, whereas hypertension and BMI were only adjunctive factors. Further studies regarding the association of the two conditions are needed to illustrate the relationship and improve management strategies. Limited resources for HCV prevention in Egypt necessitates that healthcare policy-makers should implement prevention strategies and infection control programs in healthcare settings to avoid the double burden of HCV and DM and to improve the overall quality of care.


We acknowledge the Internal Medicine and Clinical Pathology Departments, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University. The authors would like also to thank all nurses who helped in collecting the samples. The research team thanks all patients for their co-operation.


Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Viewing options

Recommended Conferences
Post your comment

Share This Article

Flyer image
journal indexing image

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh